0
0
Read Time:1 Minute, 56 Second
‘Consistent FC’ is in a wording that is related with Supreme Court decisions particularly when judges of the court convey a full seat excusal of political cases before them – a valid example being the 2020 political race request.
Mahama stresses that such discernment and scorn of the zenith courts, is, “a lamentable turn of events. One of the most frightening existential danger to any majority rules system is when residents think their legal executive holds no incentive for them,” he added.
Mahama further recommended that the ongoing harm of the legal executive and the work expected to reestablish that battered picture should have been embraced by another Chief Justice.
Perception of Supreme Court being ‘Unanimous FC,’ threat to democracy – Mahama warns
-
other stories
-
Google representatives baffled after office Covid flare-ups, a call to change immunization strategy
-
Sarkodie charged me $25K for just a feature” – Underground artist fumes
-
West African Examination Council Put In Strict Measures In 2022 Wassce
-
Afia Schwar begins another hamburger with Kennedy Agyapong
-
You are jokers – CountryMan Songo hammers Asamoah Gyan’s faultfinders
Happy
0 %
Sad
0 %
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
0 %
Surprise
0 %
